Giulio Zeppieri vs Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Zeppieri and Mendez compare on second serve point wins? Zeppieri has a slight edge, winning 47.29% compared to Mendez's 43.26% in recent form.
• In terms of returning serve, Mendez appears stronger, winning 47.47% of opponents' second serve points, while Zeppieri wins 41.99%.
• Mendez also leads in first serve return stats, with a 27.23% success rate compared to Zeppieri’s 23.43%.
• Under pressure, both players perform similarly, with Mendez saving slightly more breakpoints at 54.15% versus Zeppieri's 53.81%.
• Overall performance shows Zeppieri has a higher win percentage over the last year at 58.62%, whereas Mendez stands at 53.85%.
• Which is their best-performing surface? Zeppieri excels on Hard courts with a win rate of 58%, while Mendez is strongest on Indoor Hard with 67%.
• At the Challenger/ITF level, Zeppieri stands out, winning 61.11% of matches compared to Mendez's 44.44%.
• Compared to each other, who has faced tougher competition? Zeppieri's average opponent rank of 214.55 suggests tougher matchups than Mendez’s average opponent rank of 309.85.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Zeppieri is more likely to prevail, having won 60% of these scenarios recently, against Mendez’s 48% success rate.
• Zeppieri’s breakpoint conversion is close to Mendez’s, with Mendez converting 31.52% and Zeppieri 29.91% of opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (June 18, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the upcoming tennis match, specific statistics highlight the strengths and challenges each player faces.

Zeppieri demonstrates a slightly better performance on second serves, an aspect critical in match prediction, suggesting a minor competitive edge in serve-related play.

Mendez excels in return games, especially on first and second serves, indicating potential pressure on Zeppieri’s service games.

Both players perform comparably when it comes to breakpoint saving, while Zeppieri shines in deciding sets, which could be crucial in a closely contested match.

Despite Mendez’s efficiency in converting breakpoints, Zeppieri’s higher win rate on Hard surfaces and overall match performance, coupled with stronger opponents faced, tilts the prediction in his favor.

Based on these analyses, Zeppieri seems more poised to claim victory in this encounter.